TRUST THE BEST-SELLING DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE CERT GUIDE LATEST REAL TEST

Trust the best-selling Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Cert Guide Latest Real Test

Trust the best-selling Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Cert Guide Latest Real Test

Blog Article

Tags: Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Real Test, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Questions, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Book Pdf, Test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Collection Pdf, Reliable Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Vce

BONUS!!! Download part of PassReview Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oA1YwzsxGejScff4c2-NU4ss6_ihvEMH

Because Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam is concerning the future and the destiny of IT people, they pay more attention to the certification. When you decide to choosing IT industry, you have proved your ability. However, what we learn is not enough at all. Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Certification will be a big challenge for the candidates. If you decide to join our PassReview, we guarantee your success in the first attempt. If you fail, FULL REFUND!

One of the few things that can't be brought back is the wasted time, so don't waste your precious time and get your Databricks practice test in time by our latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions from our online test engine. You will be able to clear your Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Real Exam with our online version providing exam simulation. Your goal is very easy to accomplish and 100% guaranteed.

>> Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Real Test <<

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Questions, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Book Pdf

Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study question is compiled and verified by the first-rate experts in the industry domestically and they are linked closely with the real exam. Our test bank provides all the questions which may appear in the real exam and all the important information about the exam. You can use the practice test software to test whether you have mastered the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Practice materials and the function of stimulating the exam to be familiar with the real exam's pace. So our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions are real-exam-based and convenient for the clients to prepare for the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q54-Q59):

NEW QUESTION # 54
A Generative AI Engineer is creating an agent-based LLM system for their favorite monster truck team. The system can answer text based questions about the monster truck team, lookup event dates via an API call, or query tables on the team's latest standings.
How could the Generative AI Engineer best design these capabilities into their system?

  • A. Write a system prompt for the agent listing available tools and bundle it into an agent system that runs a number of calls to solve a query.
  • B. Instruct the LLM to respond with "RAG", "API", or "TABLE" depending on the query, then use text parsing and conditional statements to resolve the query.
  • C. Ingest PDF documents about the monster truck team into a vector store and query it in a RAG architecture.
  • D. Build a system prompt with all possible event dates and table information in the system prompt. Use a RAG architecture to lookup generic text questions and otherwise leverage the information in the system prompt.

Answer: A

Explanation:
In this scenario, the Generative AI Engineer needs to design a system that can handle different types of queries about the monster truck team. The queries may involve text-based information, API lookups for event dates, or table queries for standings. The best solution is to implement atool-based agent system.
Here's how option B works, and why it's the most appropriate answer:
* System Design Using Agent-Based Model:In modern agent-based LLM systems, you can design a system where the LLM (Large Language Model) acts as a central orchestrator. The model can "decide" which tools to use based on the query. These tools can include API calls, table lookups, or natural language searches. The system should contain asystem promptthat informs the LLM about the available tools.
* System Prompt Listing Tools:By creating a well-craftedsystem prompt, the LLM knows which tools are at its disposal. For instance, one tool may query an external API for event dates, another might look up standings in a database, and a third may involve searching a vector database for general text-based information. Theagentwill be responsible for calling the appropriate tool depending on the query.
* Agent Orchestration of Calls:The agent system is designed to execute a series of steps based on the incoming query. If a user asks for the next event date, the system will recognize this as a task that requires an API call. If the user asks about standings, the agent might query the appropriate table in the database. For text-based questions, it may call a search function over ingested data. The agent orchestrates this entire process, ensuring the LLM makes calls to the right resources dynamically.
* Generative AI Tools and Context:This is a standard architecture for integrating multiple functionalities into a system where each query requires different actions. The core design in option B is efficient because it keeps the system modular and dynamic by leveraging tools rather than overloading the LLM with static information in a system prompt (like option D).
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (RAG Architecture): While relevant, simply ingesting PDFs into a vector store only helps with text-based retrieval. It wouldn't help with API lookups or table queries.
* C (Conditional Logic with RAG/API/TABLE): Although this approach works, it relies heavily on manual text parsing and might introduce complexity when scaling the system.
* D (System Prompt with Event Dates and Standings): Hardcoding dates and table information into a system prompt isn't scalable. As the standings or events change, the system would need constant updating, making it inefficient.
By bundling multiple tools into a single agent-based system (as in option B), the Generative AI Engineer can best handle the diverse requirements of this system.


NEW QUESTION # 55
A Generative AI Engineer is designing a chatbot for a gaming company that aims to engage users on its platform while its users play online video games.
Which metric would help them increase user engagement and retention for their platform?

  • A. Randomness
  • B. Repetition of responses
  • C. Lack of relevance
  • D. Diversity of responses

Answer: D

Explanation:
In the context of designing a chatbot to engage users on a gaming platform,diversity of responses(option B) is a key metric to increase user engagement and retention. Here's why:
* Diverse and Engaging Interactions:A chatbot that provides varied and interesting responses will keep users engaged, especially in an interactive environment like a gaming platform. Gamers typically enjoy dynamic and evolving conversations, anddiversity of responseshelps prevent monotony, encouraging users to interact more frequently with the bot.
* Increasing Retention:By offering different types of responses to similar queries, the chatbot can create a sense of novelty and excitement, which enhances the user's experience and makes them more likely to return to the platform.
* Why Other Options Are Less Effective:
* A (Randomness): Random responses can be confusing or irrelevant, leading to frustration and reducing engagement.
* C (Lack of Relevance): If responses are not relevant to the user's queries, this will degrade the user experience and lead to disengagement.
* D (Repetition of Responses): Repetitive responses can quickly bore users, making the chatbot feel uninteresting and reducing the likelihood of continued interaction.
Thus,diversity of responses(option B) is the most effective way to keep users engaged and retain them on the platform.


NEW QUESTION # 56
A Generative Al Engineer is tasked with developing an application that is based on an open source large language model (LLM). They need a foundation LLM with a large context window.
Which model fits this need?

  • A. DBRX
  • B. MPT-30B
  • C. DistilBERT
  • D. Llama2-70B

Answer: D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs an open-source LLM with a large context window to develop an application.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: DistilBERT: While an efficient and smaller version of BERT, DistilBERT does not provide a particularly large context window.
* Option B: MPT-30B: This model, while large, is not specified as being particularly notable for its context window capabilities.
* Option C: Llama2-70B: Known for its large model size and extensive capabilities, including a large context window. It is also available as an open-source model, making it ideal for applications requiring extensive contextual understanding.
* Option D: DBRX: This is not a recognized standard model in the context of large language models with extensive context windows.
Thus,Option C(Llama2-70B) is the best fit as it meets the criteria of having a large context window and being available for open-source use, suitable for developing robust language understanding applications.


NEW QUESTION # 57
A Generative AI Engineer is creating an LLM-powered application that will need access to up-to-date news articles and stock prices.
The design requires the use of stock prices which are stored in Delta tables and finding the latest relevant news articles by searching the internet.
How should the Generative AI Engineer architect their LLM system?

  • A. Create an agent with tools for SQL querying of Delta tables and web searching, provide retrieved values to an LLM for generation of response.
  • B. Use an LLM to summarize the latest news articles and lookup stock tickers from the summaries to find stock prices.
  • C. Download and store news articles and stock price information in a vector store. Use a RAG architecture to retrieve and generate at runtime.
  • D. Query the Delta table for volatile stock prices and use an LLM to generate a search query to investigate potential causes of the stock volatility.

Answer: A

Explanation:
To build an LLM-powered system that accesses up-to-date news articles and stock prices, the best approach is tocreate an agentthat has access to specific tools (option D).
* Agent with SQL and Web Search Capabilities:By using an agent-based architecture, the LLM can interact with external tools. The agent can query Delta tables (for up-to-date stock prices) via SQL and perform web searches to retrieve the latest news articles. This modular approach ensures the system can access both structured (stock prices) and unstructured (news) data sources dynamically.
* Why This Approach Works:
* SQL Queries for Stock Prices: Delta tables store stock prices, which the agent can query directly for the latest data.
* Web Search for News: For news articles, the agent can generate search queries and retrieve the most relevant and recent articles, then pass them to the LLM for processing.
* Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
* A (Summarizing News for Stock Prices): This convoluted approach would not ensure accuracy when retrieving stock prices, which are already structured and stored in Delta tables.
* B (Stock Price Volatility Queries): While this could retrieve relevant information, it doesn't address how to obtain the most up-to-date news articles.
* C (Vector Store): Storing news articles and stock prices in a vector store might not capture the real-time nature of stock data and news updates, as it relies on pre-existing data rather than dynamic querying.
Thus, using an agent with access to both SQL for querying stock prices and web search for retrieving news articles is the best approach for ensuring up-to-date and accurate responses.


NEW QUESTION # 58
A Generative Al Engineer is ready to deploy an LLM application written using Foundation Model APIs. They want to follow security best practices for production scenarios Which authentication method should they choose?

  • A. Use OAuth machine-to-machine authentication
  • B. Use a frequently rotated access token belonging to either a workspace user or a service principal
  • C. Use an access token belonging to any workspace user
  • D. Use an access token belonging to service principals

Answer: D

Explanation:
The task is to deploy an LLM application using Foundation Model APIs in a production environment while adhering to security best practices. Authentication is critical for securing access to Databricks resources, such as the Foundation Model API. Let's evaluate the options based on Databricks' security guidelines for production scenarios.
* Option A: Use an access token belonging to service principals
* Service principals are non-human identities designed for automated workflows and applications in Databricks. Using an access token tied to a service principal ensures that the authentication is scoped to the application, follows least-privilege principles (via role-based access control), and avoids reliance on individual user credentials. This is a security best practice for production deployments.
* Databricks Reference:"For production applications, use service principals with access tokens to authenticate securely, avoiding user-specific credentials"("Databricks Security Best Practices,"
2023). Additionally, the "Foundation Model API Documentation" states:"Service principal tokens are recommended for programmatic access to Foundation Model APIs."
* Option B: Use a frequently rotated access token belonging to either a workspace user or a service principal
* Frequent rotation enhances security by limiting token exposure, but tying the token to a workspace user introduces risks (e.g., user account changes, broader permissions). Including both user and service principal options dilutes the focus on application-specific security, making this less ideal than a service-principal-only approach. It also adds operational overhead without clear benefits over Option A.
* Databricks Reference:"While token rotation is a good practice, service principals are preferred over user accounts for application authentication"("Managing Tokens in Databricks," 2023).
* Option C: Use OAuth machine-to-machine authentication
* OAuth M2M (e.g., client credentials flow) is a secure method for application-to-service communication, often using service principals under the hood. However, Databricks' Foundation Model API primarily supports personal access tokens (PATs) or service principal tokens over full OAuth flows for simplicity in production setups. OAuth M2M adds complexity (e.g., managing refresh tokens) without a clear advantage in this context.
* Databricks Reference:"OAuth is supported in Databricks, but service principal tokens are simpler and sufficient for most API-based workloads"("Databricks Authentication Guide," 2023).
* Option D: Use an access token belonging to any workspace user
* Using a user's access token ties the application to an individual's identity, violating security best practices. It risks exposure if the user leaves, changes roles, or has overly broad permissions, and it's not scalable or auditable for production.
* Databricks Reference:"Avoid using personal user tokens for production applications due to security and governance concerns"("Databricks Security Best Practices," 2023).
Conclusion: Option A is the best choice, as it uses a service principal's access token, aligning with Databricks' security best practices for production LLM applications. It ensures secure, application-specific authentication with minimal complexity, as explicitly recommended for Foundation Model API deployments.


NEW QUESTION # 59
......

By selecting our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate training material, you will be able to pass the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam in the first attempt. You will be able to get the desired results in Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification exam by checking out the unique self-assessment features of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Practice Test software. You can easily get the high paying job if you are passing the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam in the first attempt, and our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study guides can help you do so.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Questions: https://www.passreview.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate_exam-braindumps.html

Online and offline chat service are available, they possess the professional knowledge for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials, and if you have any questions, you can consult us, All the contents of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Questions training pdf are compiled by our leading experts, So, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Questions - Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate study guide always principles itself to be a better and better practice test, Databricks Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Real Test Up to now, more than 98 percent of buyers of our practice materials have passed it successfully.

or Enter, for example, Full-Resolution Preview on the Fly, Online and offline chat service are available, they possess the professional knowledge for Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Materials, and if you have any questions, you can consult us.

Free PDF Databricks - Updated Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Real Test

All the contents of the Generative AI Engineer training pdf are compiled Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate by our leading experts, So, Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate study guide always principles itself to be a better and better practice test.

Up to now, more than 98 percent of buyers Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps Questions of our practice materials have passed it successfully, So it has very high value.

2025 Latest PassReview Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF Dumps and Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Engine Free Share: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oA1YwzsxGejScff4c2-NU4ss6_ihvEMH

Report this page